This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
3 龙虾机器人 openclaw 爆火，详情可参考同城约会
Мерц резко сменил риторику во время встречи в Китае09:25。WPS官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
let { instance } =